Hemodiafiltration May Improve Survival Compared with Hemodialysis

Full access

Trials comparing hemodiafiltration and hemodialysis have yielded inconclusive results but have had significant limitations. In The New England Journal of Medicine study, a recent meta-analysis of patient-level data suggested a survival benefit of hemodiafiltration when a convection volume was delivered at a high dose. This trial assessed survival in patients with kidney failure receiving high-dose hemodiafiltration versus conventional, high-flux hemodialysis.

The pragmatic, randomized trial included 1360 patients with kidney failure and at least 3 months on high-flux hemodialysis, enrolled at 61 European centers. All were considered candidates for a convection volume of at least 23 L per session in post-dilution mode. Patients were assigned to open-label treatment with high-dose hemodiafiltration or continued conventional, high-flux hemodialysis. All-cause mortality was assessed at a median follow-up of 30 months, along with secondary outcomes.

In the hemodiafiltration group, the mean convection volume was 25.3 L per session. All-cause mortality was 17.3% in patients assigned to hemodiafiltration versus 21.9% in the hemodialysis group. The survival benefit of hemodiafiltration was greater for patients without a baseline history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes: hazard ratios, 0.58 and 0.65, respectively. Risks of death from cardiovascular causes and a composite of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes were similar between groups.

This clinical trial finds a survival benefit of high-dose hemodiafiltration compared with conventional, high-flux hemodialysis in patients with kidney failure. The effects on survival may vary according to comorbidity and other patient characteristics [Blankestijn PJ, et al. Effect of hemodiafiltration or hemodialysis on mortality in kidney failure. N Engl J Med, published online ahead of print June 16, 2023. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304820; https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2304820].

Save