Center for Scientific Review’s Elimination of Study Section Perilous to Kidney Community
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) oversees peer review of NIH grant applications. CSR recently announced a change to study sections that will have a significant effect on the kidney community.
NIH grant applications are reviewed by content experts in study sections relevant to the application. CSR reduced the number of study sections for Gastrointestinal, Renal, Endocrine Systems by one section. Eliminating a kidney study section results in grants being assigned to broader sections that focus on issues outside of nephrology as well. This can negatively impact the quality of the review and reduce the probability of a grant being funded.
Center for Scientific Review’s Elimination of Study Section Perilous to Kidney Community
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) oversees peer review of NIH grant applications. CSR recently announced a change to study sections that will have a significant effect on the kidney community.
NIH grant applications are reviewed by content experts in study sections relevant to the application. CSR reduced the number of study sections for Gastrointestinal, Renal, Endocrine Systems by one section. Eliminating a kidney study section results in grants being assigned to broader sections that focus on issues outside of nephrology as well. This can negatively impact the quality of the review and reduce the probability of a grant being funded.
ASN is extremely concerned that CSR’s decision will result in less kidney research being funded by the NIH.
The decision to eliminate a study section is a stark contrast to unprecedented interest across the federal government to investing in efforts to conquer kidney diseases. In a letter to CSR , ASN President Anupam Agarwal, MD, FASN noted that promoting kidney health is now a national priority, writing:
Research forms the foundation for advances in care of people with kidney diseases. Kidney investigators will now likely find submitting a successful grant application to the NIH to be more challenging. Dr. Agarwal asked CSR to provide data regarding whether this change reduces the number of funded grants focused on kidney research.
Renewed governmental and private sector interest in and support for innovations in kidney care holds the promise of pivotal, transformational changes in care for those with kidney diseases. Without appropriate funding priorities that attract investigators, kidney diseases will continue as a major public health burden, researchers will be forced to turn to other priorities, and practicing nephrologists and their patients will see the number of available therapies remain stagnant.