Weinhandl ED, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, et al.. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:499–506.
Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bargman J, Vonesh E. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171:110–8.
United States Renal Data System. U.S. Department of Public Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 2011.
Yeates K, Zhu N, Vonesh E, Trpeski L, et al.. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012. Epub 2012/03/07.
Sanabria M, Munoz J, Trillos C, et al.. Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs. hemodialysis in Colombia. Kidney Int Suppl. 2008: S165–72.
Grenêche S, D’Andon A, Jacquelinet C, Faller B, Fouque D, Laville B. Choosing between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis: a critical appraisal of the literature. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique 2005; 1:213–20.
McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20:155–63.
Mehrotra R. Choice of dialysis modality. Kidney Int 2011; 80:909–11.
In the 1960s, peritoneal dialysis for the treatment of uremia was performed intermittently. Patients would come in to receive treatment for 10 to 24 hours or more at a time, two to four times weekly. It was soon recognized that intermittent peritoneal dialysis did not provide adequate control of uremia and this approach was abandoned in favor of thrice-weekly hemodialysis. This changed in 1975 with the successful treatment of one patient with peritoneal dialysis performed continuously, rather than intermittently, while living at home, rather than in a healthcare setting.